BCS Playoff system
After a yearlong hiatus, and after becoming Dr. Cooke, I have decided to write down my thoughts on the BCS bowl system. The problem with the current system is two-fold.
- It doesn't allow the smaller conference teams a fair shot at the title.
- There is an unsatisfying and inexact method for selecting the two teams that should play for the national championship.
After the first two rounds, which would be played on neutral fields and tickets sold in advance (and given to the schools participating), there would be three final games: the semifinals, which would occur on New Years Day, and the championship a week later. The Rose, Orange, Cotton, and Fiesta can alternate turns hosting the three big games, and the other can match two of the top losers and still favor the BCS conferences if they so choose.
The real key to this plan is the continuation of the other bowl games. All teams eliminated from the tournament would still be eligible for bowl games, and would still get a chance to end their season with a win. The problem with an eight team playoff is the elimination of the little conferences. Right now there is no room for all three undefeated small conference teams, Ball State, Boise State, and Utah, to be included in the eight. And all three of those teams should have a chance to compete for the national title. A minimum of 16 teams is needed to ensure all undefeated teams a spot.
My nephew Trey and I
My sister Harsha and her baby Trey
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home